| |||||||||
In mathematical analysis, a sequence { fn } of functions converges uniformly to a limiting function f if the speed of convergence of fn(x) to f(x) does not depend on x. This notion is used because several important properties of the functions fn, such as continuity, differentiability and Riemann integrability, are only transferred to the limit f if the convergence is uniform.
Suppose S is a set and fn : S -> R are real-valued functions for every natural number n. We say that the sequence (fn) converges uniformly with limit f : S -> R iff
Compare this to the concept of pointwise convergence: The sequence (fn) converges pointwise with limit f : S -> R iff
In the case of uniform convergence, N can only depend on ε, while in the case of pointwise convergence N may depend on ε and x. It is therefore plain that uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. The converse is not true, as the following example shows: take S to be the unit interval [0,1] and define fn(x) = xn for every natural number n. Then (fn) converges pointwise to the function f defined by f(x) = 0 if x < 1 and f(1) = 1. This convergence is not uniform: for instance for ε = 1/4, there exists no N as required by the definition.
Given a topological space X, we can equip the space of real/complex functions over X with the uniform norm topology. Then, uniform convergence simply means convergence in the uniform norm topology.
If S is a real interval (or indeed any topological space), we can talk about the continuity of the functions fn and f. The following is the more important result about uniform continuity:
If S is an interval and all the functions fn are differentiable and converge to a limit f, it is often desirable to differentiate the limit function f by taking the limit of the derivatives of fn. This is however in general not possible: even if the convergence is uniform, the limit function need not be differentiable, and even if it is differentiable, the derivative of the limit function need not be equal to the limit of the derivatives. Consider for instance fn(x) = 1/n sin(nx) with uniform limit 0, but the derivatives do not approach 0. The precise statement covering this situation is as follows:
Similarly, one often wants to exchange integrals and limit processes. For the Riemann integral, one needs to require uniform convergence:
Much stronger theorems in this respect, which require not much more than pointwise convergence, can be obtained if one abandons the Riemann integral and uses the Lebesgue integral instead.
If S is a compact interval (or in general a compact topological space), and (fn) is a monotone increasing sequence (meaning fn(x) ≤ fn+1(x) for all n and x) of continuous functions with a pointwise limit f which is also continuous, then the convergence is necessarily uniform ("Dini's theorem"). Uniform convergence is also guaranteed if S is a compact interval and (fn) is an equicontinuous sequence that converges pointwise.
One may straightforwardly extend the concept to functions S -> M, where (M, d) is a metric space, by replacing |fn(x) - f(x)| with d(fn(x), f(x)).
The most general setting is the uniform convergence of nets of functions S -> X, where X is a uniform space. We say that the net (fα) converges uniformly with limit f : S -> X iff
The above mentioned theorem, stating that the uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous, remains correct in these settings.
Augustin Louis Cauchy in 1821 published a faulty proof of the false statement that the pointwise limit of a sequence of continuous functions is always continuous. Joseph Fourier and Niels Henrik Abel found counter examples in the context of Fourier series. Dirichlet then analyzed Cauchy's proof and found the mistake: the notion of pointwise convergence had to be replaced by uniform convergence.
Bernhard Riemann pointed to the need for distinguishing between absolutely and conditionally convergent series by his Rearrangement Theorem. It shows that it is possible to rearrange the terms of a conditionally convergent series so that the derived series converges to any desired limit.
Theory and Application of Infinite Series, Konrad Knopf, Blackie and Son, London, 1954, reprinted by Dover Publications, ISBN 0486661652