| |||||||||
Throughout this article, exponential or scientific notation is used. 106 could also be written as the number 1 followed by six 0's, 1 000 000; 109 could be written as 1 000 000 000, and so on.
Names of numbers larger than a quadrillion are almost never used, for reasons discussed further below. It is debatable which of them should be considered real working English vocabulary and which are merely trivia, curiosities, or coinages. The following table lists those names of numbers which are found in many English dictionaries and thus have a special claim to being "real words."
| Name | American and modern British value ("short scale") | Traditional British value ("long scale") | Authorities | Google hits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| million | 106 | 106 | √ AHD4, √ COD, √ OED2, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 54,900,000 Pages 6,880,000 Articles |
| milliard | 109 | √ AHD4, √ OED2 | 24,300 English pages 466,700 other pages 41,000 Articles | |
| billion | 109 | 1012 | √ AHD4, √ COD, √ OED2, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 12,700,000 English pages (mostly using 109) 3,000,000 other pages 2,200,000 Articles |
| trillion | 1012 | 1018 | √ AHD4, √ COD, √ OED2, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 1,460,000 Pages 303,000 Articles |
| quadrillion | 1015 | 1024 | √ AHD4, √ OED2, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 63,200 Pages 52,800 Articles |
| quintillion | 1018 | 1030 | √ AHD4, √ OED2, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 15,300 Pages 42,900 Articles |
| sextillion | 1021 | 1036 | √ AHD4, √ OED2, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 6,260 Pages 38,500 Articles |
| septillion | 1024 | 1042 | √ AHD4, √ OED2, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 3,460 Pages 37,800 Articles |
| octillion | 1027 | 1048 | √ AHD4, √ OED2, √ OEDnew, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 3,440 Pages 39,700 Articles |
| nonillion | 1030 | 1054 | √ AHD4, √ OED2, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 1,980 Pages 715 Articles |
| decillion | 1033 | 1060 | √ AHD4, √ OED2, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 4,940 Pages 783 Articles |
| undecillion | 1036 | 1066 | √ AHD4, √ RHD2-1987, × ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 854 Pages 294 Articles |
| duodecillion | 1039 | 1072 | √ AHD4, √ RHD2-1987, × ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 1250 Pages 249 Articles |
| tredecillion | 1042 | 1078 | √ AHD4, √ RHD2-1987, × ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 885 Pages 182 Articles |
| quattuordecillion | 1045 | 1084 | √ AHD4, √ RHD2-1987, × ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 830 Pages 154 Articles |
| quindecillion | 1048 | 1090 | √ AHD4, √ RHD2-1987, × ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 686 Pages 151 Articles |
| sexdecillion | 1051 | 1096 | √ AHD4, √ RHD2-1987, × ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 759 Pages 145 Articles |
| septendecillion | 1054 | 10102 | √ AHD4, √ RHD2-1987, × ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 699 Pages 138 Articles |
| octodecillion | 1057 | 10108 | √ AHD4, √ RHD2-1987, × ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 863 Pages 157 Articles |
| novemdecillion | 1060 | 10114 | √ AHD4, √ RHD2-1987, × ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 941 Pages 182 Articles |
| vigintillion | 1063 | 10120 | √ AHD4, √ OED2, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 1550 Pages 410 Articles |
| googol | 10100 | 10100 | √ AHD4, √ OED2, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 82,500 Pages 10,200 Articles |
| centillion | 10303 | 10600 | √ AHD4, √ OED2 | 8560 Pages 25 Articles |
| googolplex | 10googol | 10googol | √ AHD4, √ OED2, √ RHD2-1987, √ ShorterOED3-1993, √ W3-1993 | 28,100 Pages 14,400 Articles |
Note the oddity that some dictionaries list "decillion" and "vigintillion," but not of the numbers in between (undecillion, duodecillion, etc.)
Vigintillion appears to be the highest name ending in -illion that is included in these dictionaries. Trigintillion, often cited as a word in discussions of names of large numbers, is not included in any of them; nor are any of the names that can easily be created by extending the naming pattern (unvigintillion, duovigintillion, duoquinquagintillion, etc.)
All of the dictionaries included googol and googolplex, generally crediting it to the Kasner and Newman book and to Kasners' nephew. None include any higher names in the googol family (googolplexplex, etc.) The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary comments that googol and googolplex are "not in formal mathematical use."
Dictionaries cited:
AHD4: American Heritage Dictionary, 4th edition, at http://www.bartleby.com/61
COD: Cambridge Online Dictionaries, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press ; at http://dictionary.cambridge.org
OED2: Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edition, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press ; (and addendums since publication in 1989)
OEDnew: Oxford English Dictionary, New Edition, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press ; at http://www.oed.com (subscription required)
RHD2-1987: The Random House Dictionary, 2nd Unabridged Edition, 1987, Random House
ShorterOED3-1993: Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd edition, 1993, Oxford: Clarendon Press
W3-1993: Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged, 1993, Merriam-Webster
Dcom: Dictionary.com
√ means the word is included in the dictionary
× means the word is not included in the dictionary
"Google hits" means the number of hits reported by Google when searching the entire web and the DejaNews USENET archives as of June 4, 2004.
Some large numbers have real referents in human experience. Their names are real words, encountered in many contexts. For example, on one day in 2004, Google News showed 78,600 hits on "billion," starting with "Turkey Repays $1.6 Billion In Foreign Debt." It shows 9870 hits on "trillion," and 56 on "quadrillion:" "The US Department of Energy reports that in 2002, the United States economy consumed 97.6 quadrillion btus (quad btus)."
References to names of quantities larger than a quadrillion, however, are rare, and increasingly artificial; they tend to be limited to discussions of names of numbers, or mathematical concepts. For example, the first hit on "quintillion" is about a man who is trying to preserve the Etsako language by codifying it, and "went as far as providing numerals from one to quintillion." "Septillion" appears—as the name of a racing yacht.
It can be argued that a number such as a "trigintillion" has no existence in the physical world. There simply is not a trigintillion of anything, and no practical need for such a name.
Nevertheless, large numbers have an intellectual fascination and are of mathematical interest. Giving them names is one of the ways in which people try to conceptualize and understand them.
In The Sand Reckoner, Archimedes estimated the number of grains of sand that would be required to fill the known universe. To do this, he called a myriad myriad (108) a "first number;" a myriad myriad first numbers as "second numbers" (1016), and so on up to "eighth numbers" (1064). He concluded that it would take less than "one thousand myriad myriad eighth numbers" grains of sand to pack the universe solid with sand.
Since then, many others have engaged in the pursuit of conceptualizing and naming numbers that really have no existence outside of the imagination. One motivation for such a pursuit is that attributed to the inventor of the word googol, who was certain that any finite number "had to have a name." Another possible motivation is competition between students in computer programming courses, where a common exercise is that of writing a program to output numbers in the form of English words.
Names of numbers large than a quadrillion, even if found in dictionaries, have a tenuous existence. Just as one can debate whether floccinaucinihilipilification is really an English word—it is in the Oxford English Dictionary, but no other—it is questionable how real the word "trigintillion" is. "Trigintillion" is only encountered in definitions, lists of names of large numbers, and "Sand Reckoner"-like discourses on the meaning of very large numbers.
Even well-established names like "sextillion" are rarely used, even in those contexts where they have a real meaning—science, astronomy, and engineering. In science, since the 1800s, numbers have been written using the familiar "scientific notation," in which powers of ten are expressed as a ten with a numeric superscript, e.g. "The X-ray emission of the radio galaxy is 1.3 × 1045 ergs." When a number such as 1045 needs to be referred to in words, it is simply read out: "ten to the forty-fifth." This is just as easy to say, easier to understand, and less ambiguous than "quattuordecillion" (which means something different to American and British audiences—assuming that there are any listeners who understand this number without consulting a dictionary). When a number represents a measurement rather than a count, SI prefixes are used; one says "femtosecond," not "one quadrillionth of a second." In some cases, specialized very large units are used, such as the astronomer's parsec and light year.
It should be noted, too, that most names proposed for large numbers belong to systematic schemes which are extensible. Thus, many names for large numbers are simply the result of following a naming system to its logical conclusion—or extending it further. Glancing at the table for the Googol family, it is clear what the value of a "Googolquattuordeciplex" would be if there were such a word, but that does not mean that such a word exists, nor that there is any value in coining it.
Here we present some names that have been given to large numbers, and the context and authority for the names. These numbers are almost pure mathematical abstractions, not physical realities. The names for such numbers are very rarely used. They may have a claim staked out for them in reference books, but they remain more in the nature of curiosities, trivia, or mathematical recreation than genuine working English vocabulary.
Nicolas Chuquet's book Triparty en la science des nombres was not published during his lifetime, but most of it was copied by Estienne de la Roche for a portion of his 1520 book, Larismetique. Chuquet's book contains a passage in which he shows a large number marked off into groups of six digits, with the comment:
Chuquet is sometimes credited with "inventing" the names million, billion, trillion, quadrillion, and so forth. This is an oversimplification.
Adam and Chuquet used the "long scale" of powers of a million; that is, a bimillion (Adam) 1012, and a trimillion was 1018.
The googol and googolplex were introduced in Kasner and Newman's 1940 book, Mathematics and the Imagination, in this passage:
| Value | Name | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| 10100 | Googol | Kasner and Newman, dictionaries (see above) |
| 10googol = <math>\,\!10^{10^{100}}<math> | Googolplex | Kasner and Newman, dictionaries (see above) |
| 10googolplex = <math>\,\!10^{10^{10^{100}}}<math> | Googolplexplex or Googolduplex | |
| 10googolduplex = <math>\,\!10^{10^{10^{10^{100}}}}<math> | Googolplexplexplex or Googoltriplex | |
| 10googoltriplex = <math>\,\!10^{10^{10^{10^{10^{100}}}}}<math> | Googolplexplexplexplex |
This table illustrates several systems for naming large numbers, and shows how they can be extended past decillion.
Traditional British usage assigned new names for each power of one million (the long scale). It was adapted from French usage, and is similar to the system that was documented or invented by Chuquet.
Traditional American usage (which, oddly enough, was also adapted from French usage but at a later date), and modern British usage, assigns new names for each power of one thousand (the short scale. Thus, a "billion" is 109, a "trillion" is 1012, and so forth.
Traditional French usage has varied; in 1948, France, which had been using the short scale, reverted to the long scale.
The term milliard is unambiguous and always means 109. It is almost never seen in American usage, rarely in British usage, and frequently in European usage. The term is sometimes attributed to a French mathematician named Jacques Pelletier du Mans circa 1550, but the Oxford English Dictionary states that the term derives from post-Classical latin term milliartum, which became milliare and then milliart and finally to our modern term.
With regard to names ending in -illiard, milliard is certainly in widespread use, but the degree of actual use of the larger terms is questionable. For example, as of 2004, Google searches on French-language pages for "trillion," "trilliard," "quadrillion," "quadrilliard," and "quintillion" return, respectively, 6630, 102, 312, 7, and 127 hits, respectively.
For additional details, see: billion and long scale.
| Value | USA and Modern British ("short scale") | Traditional British ("long scale") | Traditional European (Pelletier) ("long scale") |
|---|---|---|---|
| 103 | Thousand | Thousand | Thousand |
| 106 | Million | Million | Million |
| 109 | Billion | Thousand million | Milliard |
| 1012 | Trillion | Billion | Billion |
| 1015 | Quadrillion | Thousand billion | Billiard |
| 1018 | Quintillion | Trillion | Trillion |
| 1021 | Sextillion | Thousand trillion | Trilliard |
| 1024 | Septillion | Quadrillion | Quadrillion |
| 1027 | Octillion | Thousand quadrillion | Quadrilliard |
| 1030 | Nonillion | Quintillion | Quintillion |
| 1033 | Decillion | Thousand quintillion | Quintilliard |
| 1036 | Undecillion | Sextillion | Sextillion |
| 1039 | Duodecillion | Thousand sextillion | Sextilliard |
| 1042 | Tredecillion | Septillion | Septillion |
| 1045 | Quattuordecillion | Thousand septillion | Septilliard |
| 1048 | Quindecillion | Octillion | Octillion |
| 1051 | Sexdecillion | Thousand octillion | Octilliard |
| 1054 | Septendecillion | Nonillion | Nonillion |
| 1057 | Octodecillion | Thousand nonillion | Nonilliard |
| 1060 | Novemdecillion | Decillion | Decillion |
| 1063 | Vigintillion | Thousand decillion | Decilliard |
| 1066 | Unvigintillion | Undecillion | Undecillion |
| 1069 | Duovigintillion | Thousand undecillion | Undecilliard |
| 1072 | Trevigintillion | Duodecillion | Duodecillion |
| 1075 | Quattuorvigintillion | Thousand duodecillion | Duodecilliard |
| 1078 | Quinvigintillion | Tredecillion | Tredecillion |
| 1081 | Sexvigintillion | Thousand tredecillion | Tredecilliard |
| 1084 | Septenvigintillion | Quattuordecillion | Quattuordecillion |
| 1087 | Octovigintillion | Thousand quattuordecillion | Quattuordecilliard |
| 1090 | Novemvigintillion | Quindecillion | Quindecillion |
| 1093 | Trigintillion | Thousand quindecillion | Quindecilliard |
| 1096 | Untrigintillion | Sexdecillion | Sexdecillion |
| 1099 | Duotrigintillion | Thousand sexdecillion | Sexdecilliard |
| 10102 | Tretrigintillion | Septendecillion | Septendecillion |
| 10105 | Quattuortrigintillion | Thousand septendecillion | Septendecilliard |
| 10108 | Quintrigintillion | Octodecillion | Octodecillion |
| 10111 | Sextrigintillion | Thousand octodecillion | Octodecilliard |
| 10114 | Septentrigintillion | Novemdecillion | Novemdecillion |
| 10117 | Octotrigintillion | Thousand novemdecillion | Novemdecilliard |
| 10120 | Novemtrigintillion | Vigintillion | Vigintillion |
| 10123 | Quadragintillion | Thousand vigintillion | Vigintilliard |
| 10126 | Unquadragintillion | Unvigintillion | Unvigintillion |
| 10129 | Duoquadragintillion | Thousand unvigintillion | Unvigintilliard |
| 10132 | Trequadragintillion | Duovigintillion | Duovigintillion |
| 10135 | Quattuorquadragintillion | Thousand duovigintillion | Duovigintilliard |
| 10138 | Quinquadragintillion | Trevigintillion | Trevigintillion |
| 10141 | Sexquadragintillion | Thousand trevigintillion | Trevigintilliard |
| 10144 | Septenquadragintillion | Quattuorvigintillion | Quattuorvigintillion |
| 10147 | Octoquadragintillion | Thousand quattuorvigintillion | Quattuorvigintilliard |
| 10150 | Novemquadragintillion | Quinvigintillion | Quinvigintillion |
| 10153 | Quinquagintillion | Thousand quinvigintillion | Quinvigintilliard |
| 10156 | Unquinquagintillion | Sexvigintillion | Sexvigintillion |
| 10159 | Duoquinquagintillion | Thousand sexvigintillion | Sexvigintilliard |
| 10162 | Trequinquagintillion | Septenvigintillion | Septenvigintillion |
| 10165 | Quattuorquinquagintillion | Thousand septenvigintillion | Septenvigintilliard |
| 10168 | Quinquinquagintillion | Octovigintillion | Octovigintillion |
| 10171 | Sexquinquagintillion | Thousand octovigintillion | Octovigintilliard |
| 10174 | Septenquinquagintillion | Novemvigintillion | Novemvigintillion |
| 10177 | Octoquinquagintillion | Thousand novemvigintillion | Novemvigintilliard |
| 10180 | Novemquinquagintillion | Trigintillion | Trigintillion |
| 10183 | Sexagintillion | Thousand trigintillion | Trigintilliard |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10213 | Septuagintillion | Thousand quintrigintillion | Quintrigintilliard |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10240 | Novemseptuagintillion | Quadragintillion | Quadragintillion |
| 10243 | Octogintillion | Thousand quadragintillion | Quadragintilliard |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10273 | Nonagintillion | Thousand quinquadragintillion | Quinquadragintilliard |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10300 | Novemnonagintillion | Quinquagintillion | Quinquagintillion |
| 10303 | Centillion | Thousand quinquagintillion | Quinquagintilliard |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10360 | Sexagintillion | Sexagintillion | |
| 10363 | Thousand sexagintillion | Sexagintilliard | |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10420 | Septuagintillion | Septuagintillion | |
| 10423 | Thousand septuagintillion | Septuagintilliard | |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10480 | Octogintillion | Octogintillion | |
| 10483 | Thousand octogintillion | Octogintilliard | |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10540 | Nonagintillion | Nonagintillion | |
| 10543 | Thousand nonagintillion | Nonagintilliard | |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10600 | Centillion | Centillion | |
| 10603 | Thousand centillion | Centilliard | |
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
For non-standard conventions that assign regular names to even larger numbers, see Other names of large numbers.