| |||||||||
The discovery in 1958 of a fragment of an unknown Secret Gospel of Mark provoked a storm of recrimination, denial and abuse. The Secret Gospel of Mark was quoted in a previously unknown letter of Clement of Alexandria, which had been transcribed into the endpapers of a 17th century printed book in the monastery of Mar Saba, twelve miles south of Jerusalem. The letter is consequently often called the "Mar Saba letter".
Starting with the Dead Sea Scrolls, textual discoveries in the later 20th century revealed a new understanding of the broadly divergent oral traditions and parallel texts of the Hebrew Bible, and the variety of interpretations that could be drawn from the sayings and life of Jesus of Nazareth. New texts revealed the extent of editing, suppression, omissions, additions and interpolations that went into the process of reaching the canonic New Testament that has survived and which we all know.
The letter was written by Clement to a follower named Theodore. According to the letter, the Secret Gospel of Mark was "a more spiritual Gospel for the use of those who were being perfected" in Egypt. Because of the contents of the Secret Gospel, described below, it has been heavily controversial. On one hand, it clears up some inconsistencies in Mark which are all too mysterious, such as the scantily clad man in Mark 14:51-52, and the abrupt transition in Mark 10:46. On the other hand, it has some elements of a fiction: the backstory which explains the existence of the Secret Gospel, the convienient abrupt ending right before the Secret Gospel is explained, and the sole interjection from the Carpocratians that seems to bring the subtext of the Secret Gospel into the clear.
The letter, for instance, shed light on Clement's views on justifiable means of opposing error (in this case of a minor sect, followers of a certain Carpocrates):
A justification for an ad hominem argument, for not all true things are the truth. But such techniques of achieving orthodoxy were familiar and raised no hackles in the 20th century readers who were seeing this letter for the first time.
The leader of this sect, however, had procured a copy of a work by Mark the Evangelist that was being very carefully guarded in Alexandria. It is significant that Clement attributes the uses being made of Secret Mark to Carpocrates, who was born a century earlier. Clement must have believed that Secret Mark existed before ca 125 CE. How it got to Alexandria, Clement reports to his correspondent, referring to the Secret Gospel:
In response to his correspondent, Theodore, Clement quotes two sections which he claims have been distorted by the heretics. The brief excerpt from the Secret Gospel of Mark quoted by Clement raised a storm of controversy:
According to Clement, this episode would have been deleted from between Mark 10:34 and 35.
A second fragment of Secret Mark was deleted from Mark 10:46. This has long been recognized as a narrative discontinuity in Mark's Gospel, as in the accepted canon it awkwardly reads, "Then they come to Jericho. As he was leaving Jericho with his disciples..." That some text is missing can scarcely be a subject for controversy.
Secret Mark reads:
The statement "Jesus taught him the mystery of the kingdom of God" has been interpreted as a reference to the rites of baptism. The idea that Jesus practised baptism is absent from the synoptic gospels, though it is introduced in the Gospel of John. Several further echoes of Secret Mark are identifiable in the canonic Mark, according to textual analysts.
The canonic Gospel of Mark exists in manuscripts with nine different endings. A discussion of these endings and the canonically preferred short ending at Mark 16:8 can be found at the entry Gospel of Mark Apologists claim the abbreviated ending also to be the earliest one from the lack of references in Patristic writers and by analyzing surviving texts.
Those who wish to find a late date for Secret Mark sometimes even suggest that the shortest version of a story is usually the earliest. They offer examples such as the Book of Enoch, which retells Genesis in an elaborately detailed and expanded later rewriting. The reader will quickly comprehend the difference between a story and its expanded retelling, and a manuscript which suffers losses or gains interpolations.
Morton Smith, Jesus the Magician (1978) expands upon the discovery of the Mar Saba letter. Rather than dismiss this newly-attested miracle as mythology, Smith asked to what degree the miracle stories of the gospels might in fact be based upon actions of Jesus. Smith, himself, concluded Jesus was a magician, meaning a magus or sorcerer. This is not a conjuror who performs magic effects. The earliest Christian art (late 3rd century) portrays Jesus two different ways; as a bare-faced youth holding a wand when performing the miracles of changing water to wine, the multipication of loaves and the raising of Lazarus from the dead. When healing is the miracle, Jesus lays on hands and appears bearded and robed. This art has never been kept in secret.