Recent Articles



































Rational choice theory



         


Rational choice theory is a way of looking at deliberations between a number of potential courses of action, in which "rationality" of one form or another is used either to decide which course of action would be the best to take, or to predict which course of action actually will be taken. Such a perspective finds itself in models for both human behavior and behavior of non-human but nonetheless potentially rational entities, such as corporations.

Obviously, what is taken as "rational" is of chief importance here. Usually, "rational" is defined in a formal, mathematical way, along the lines of Game theory; this often means making a choice is taken to be equivalent to solving a mathematical optimization problem.

Often, to simplify calculation and ease prediction, some rather unrealistic assumptions are made about the world. These can include:

Assumptions such as these have sparked criticism from a number of camps. Some people have tried to create models of bounded rationality, which try to be more psychologically plausible without giving up completely on the idea that some kind of reason underlies decision-making processes.

[Top]

Why rational choice theory?

One question that can be asked is why people try to base their models on concepts such as "reason", "preferences", and what is implied by them, free will. Some potential reasons:

Various researchers has found some limits to this theory, under the name of bounded rationality, an element used for example in behavioral economics.

[Top]

See also






  View Live Article   This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License