Preponderance of the evidence



         




Preponderance of the evidence is the level of burden of persuasion typically employed in the civil procedure. In plain English, this roughly means "more likely than not."

By contrast, in criminal procedure, the required burden of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt.

The difference between the two can perhaps be seen in the criminal and civil trials of O.J. Simpson for murder. Jurors acquitted Simpson in the criminal trial, which required "proof beyond a reasonable doubt", whereas in the civil trial, a different jury looked for a "preponderance of the evidence" and found it, ruling against Simpson and finding him "liable" for the two deaths.

[edit]

See also

This law-related article is a stub. You can help BambooWeb by expanding it (http://en.BambooWeb.org/w/index.php?title=Preponderance_of_the_evidence&action=edit).


-This article has been brought to you by BambooWeb and Wikipedia-



  View Live Article   This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License