| |||||||||
Nonjudicial punishment (NJP) is a leadership tool providing United States military commanders a prompt and essential means of maintaining good order and discipline. NJP is permitted by Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which is Section 815 of Title 10 of the United States Code. The process is governed by Part V of the Manual for Courts-Martial and by service regulations. NJP proceedings are known by different terms among the United States armed forces: The US Marine Corps refers to the proceeding as "office hours" while the US Army and US Air Force refer to it as an "Article 15." In the US Navy it is called "Captain's Mast" or "Admiral's Mast."
Prior to imposition of NJP, a servicemember must first be notified by the commander of the nature of the misconduct of which he or she is accused, of the evidence supporting the accusation, and of the commander's intent to impose NJP. The commander will then hold a hearing at which the member may be present. The member may also have a spokesperson attend the hearing, may present evidence to the commander, and may request that the commander hear from certain witnesses. The commander must consider any information offered during the hearing, and must be personally convinced that the member actually committed misconduct before imposing punishment.
Maximum penalties depend on the rank of the accused and that of the officer imposing punishment.
Maximum allowable penalties for accused officers:
If the officer imposing punishmnt holds General Court Martial authority, or a commanding officer of the grade O-7 or greater:
By Commanding Officers of the grades O-4 to O-6:
By Commanding Officers of the grades O-1 to O-3
By Officers In Charge:
Maximum possible punishments for enlisted soldiers
For Commanding Officers at the grade of O-4 or above are:
For Commanding Officers at the grade of O-3 or below and and commissioned OIC:
If the member considers the punishment to be unjust or to be disproportionate to the misconduct committed, he or she may appeal to higher authority. The appeal authority may set aside the punishment, decrease its severity, or deny the appeal, but may not increase the severity of the punishment. Personnel also are permitted to refuse NJP in favor of a Court Martial, this would be done in cases where they do not feel their Commanding Officer will give them a fair hearing.
Receipt of nonjudicial punishment does not constitute a criminal conviction.
Compare with court-martial.