Logorrhoea
Logorrhoea (US logorrhea) (Greek λογορροια, logorrhoia, "word-flux") is defined as an "excessive flow of words" and, when used medically, refers to incoherent talkativeness that occurs in certain kinds of mental illness, such as mania.
The word logorrhea is often used pejoratively to describe prose that is highly abstract and contains little concrete language. Since abstract writing is hard to visualize, it often seems as though it makes no sense and all the words are excessive. Writers in academic fields that concern themselves mostly with the abstract, like Philosophy and especially Postmodernism, often fail to include extensive concrete examples of their ideas, and so a brief skim of their works might lead one to believe that it is all nonsense.
The widespread expectation that scholarly works in these fields will look at first glance like nonsense is the source of humor that pokes fun at these fields by comparing actual nonsense with real academic writing. Several computer programs have been made that can generate essays and the like that resemble the styles of these fields but are actually nonsense. A physics professor even had such an essay published in a respected journal as a practical joke. See Sokal Affair.
Logorrhea can also be used as a form of euphemism, to disguise unpleasant facts and ideas.
Examples of logorrhoea
In his essay "Politics and the English Language" (1946), the English writer George Orwell wrote about logorrhoea in politics. He took the following verse (9:11) from the book of Ecclesiastes in the Bible:
- I returned and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.
He rewrote it like this:
- Objective considerations of contemporary phenomena compel the conclusion that success or failure in competitive activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity, but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be taken into account.
Note that Orwell's sentence is bad not simply because it uses big words, but because it uses them unnecessarily. For instance, the words "objective" and "invariably" could be cut with virtually no loss of meaning. (Ironically, however, because the King James translation contains archaic grammar, some contemporary academics may find Orwell's version actually easier to understand.)
Further examples are easy to create:
- Doctors say that the best way to lose weight is to eat less.
- The medical community indicates that downsizing average total daily intake is maximally efficacious in the field of proactive weight-reduction methodologies.
- He is the sort of person who will call a spade a spade.
- This man is a member of the personality class exhibiting the tendency to term a pedally operated humus redistribution device a pedally operated humus redistribution device.
See also
