| |||||||||
Each year, numerous amendments to the United States Constitution are presented by America's lawmakers in Washington, D.C. Only 33 have been approved by Congress and of those, only 27 have been ratified by the legislatures of at least three-fourths of the states.
The framers of the United States Constitution deliberately made it a difficult process, but not so difficult as to render it an inflexible instrument of government. They sought balance between stability and malleability.
When Article V of the Constitution was drafted, it was done by the framers based on their past experience with the Articles of Confederation, which had been America's instrument of government since the revolution. To amend the Articles of Confederation, a unanimous vote of all 13 states was necessary - a consensus that proved impossible to obtain.
The Constitution has two different methods of being amended, each of which is comprised of two distinct steps.
The most commonly known method, and to date the only method ever used, is the state ratification method. An amendment is first passed by a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress. Once passed, it must be approved by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states (38 states since 1959), sometimes within a certain time frame (such as the Equal Rights Amendment, which required ratification within 7 years). Without either of these super-majorities, the proposed amendment is not ratified.
The second, as yet unutilized method, is the constitutional convention. Should the legislatures of two-thirds of the states (34 states since 1959) petition Congress to do so, a second constitutional convention would be held. Any amendments proposed by the convention would then be voted upon by the states, and again the approval by the legislatures of three-fourths would be needed to ratify.
Some constitutional scholars see the convention process as a dangerous one. They maintain that such a convention would have no limits to the amendments it could propose, and could, conceivably, propose an entirely new constitution. And while others disagree, claiming that a convention would be restricted to the subjects for which it were assembled, it is readily noted that the convention that produced the current United States Constitution was only intended to amend the Articles of Confederation.
Given the fact that the first four of these unratified amendments are still pending, meaning that they could—however unlikely—still be ratified, Congress initiated the practice in 1917 of placing deadlines on the amendments that it sends to the states for consideration, typically seven years. The only two post-1917 exceptions to this were the Nineteenth Amendment offered in 1919 and ratified in 1920, and the pending anti-child-labor amendment offered in 1924. Hence, the Equal Rights Amendment and the D.C. Voting Rights Amendment have both expired and cannot be resurrected without re-passage by Congress.
Over time, many topics have been targeted to become constitutional amendments. These topics are usually the subject of intense debate following a controversial vote in Congress or a controversial decision by a court of law--often of the United States Supreme Court, or some other highly-publicized public event.
For example, following the decision of the Supreme Court in the Roe v. Wade case in 1973, several amendments were proposed in Congress. The intent of some was to overturn the decision, and the intent of others was to bolster it. In the 93rd Congress, several joint resolutions were introduced in the House of Representatives calling for an amendment to "prohibit abortion from the moment of fertilization" (H.J.RES. 1041) or some other similar language.
Most such joint resolutions fail because they do not garner the required minimum vote of two-thirds (of a quorum) from members in both houses of Congress. In fact, these joint resolutions rarely even make it out of congressional committees.
The list of amendments that were not approved by Congress, then, is quite a long one. Members of Congress are free to propose as many amendments as they wish and on any subjects they please, and often do so several times in the two-year existence of just one term of Congress, and several times during their congressional career. For some members of Congress, the continual reintroduction of amendments is a selling point during re-election campaigns. A listing of the amendments proposed over the course of several Congresses shows many duplicates. Without fail, for example, amendments to abolish the death penalty are introduced several times during each two-year term.
The listing below, which is far from exhaustive, includes some of the hot-topic amendment proposals that have failed to result in an actual submission to the states.
See also: Proposed amendments to the United States constitution
| United States Constitution |
| Main body |
| Preamble | Article I | Article II | Article III | Article IV | Article V | Article VI | Article VII |
| Amendments |
| Bill of Rights: I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII | IX | X |
| Other amendments: XI | XII | XIII | XIV | XV | XVI | XVII | XVIII | XIX | XX | XXI | XXII | XXIII | XXIV | XXV | XXVI | XXVII |
| |
| History of the Constitution |
| Federalist Papers | Proposed amendments | Signatures | Unsuccessful amendments |
| Interpretation of the Constitution |
| Civil liberties | Congressional power of enforcement | Dormant Commerce Clause | Due process | Separation of powers |
| Specific clauses in the Constitution |
| Commerce Clause | Equal protection clause | Full Faith and Credit clause | Preemption of state and local laws | Supremacy clause |