Institutional economics
In economics, the institutional economics school goes beyond the usual economic focus on markets, to look more closely at human-made institutions. Institutional economics was once the dominant school of economics in the United States, including such famous but diverse economists as Thorstein Veblen, Wesley Mitchell, and John R. Commons. Some see Karl Marx as arguing that capitalism is an institution (rather than being natural in origins). Many institutionalist economists disagree with Marx on this, instead seeing capitalism as a natural organization.
There are at least two versions of institutional economics that currently are represented in U.S. academia:
- The "new" institutional economics derives human-made institutions from individual tastes (or preferences) and technical or natural factors, such as transaction costs. New institutionalism is a version of neoclassical economics. Some of the authors associated with this this school include Ronald Coase, Oliver Williamson, and Douglass North.
- "Traditional" institutionalism sees the factors that the new institutionalists stress as important, but reject the reduction of institutions to simply tastes, technology, and nature. Tastes, along with expectations of the future, habits, and motivations, not only determine the nature of institutions but are limited and shaped by them. If people live and work in institutions on a regular basis, it shapes their world-views. Similarly, the nature of new technologies that are developed depend on the incentives created by institutions and are thus endogenous. Some of the authors associated with this school include Robert Frank, Warren J. Samuels, Mark R. Tool, Geoffrey Hodgson, and Anne Mayhew
Some Sources
- Hodgson, Geoffrey M., "The Approach of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Literature v36, n1 (March 1998): 166-92.
- Oliver E. Williamson, "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead," Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 38 (September, 2000), pp. 595-613.
