| |||||||||
Donoghue v. Stevenson, [1932] A.C. 532, [1932] All ER Rep 1, is a famous House of Lords case in the area of the common law of tort/delict. It is perhaps most well known for the statement of Lord Atkin regarding the existence of a duty of care in Anglo-American law. Although Donoghue v. Stevenson was a Scottish case, it was undisputed by the parties that the Scots law — based on the civil law and not the common law — and the English law were identical on this issue. Consequently, the reasoning in this case has taken root in many countries.
| Contents |
The case was heard as a preliminary point of law, and proceeded on the assumption that the facts were as claimed by the appellant, May Dohoghue. She claimed that on August 26, 1928 she drank some of the contents of a bottle of ginger-beer, manufactured by the respondent, which a friend had bought for her at a cafe in Paisley, Scotland. When her friend poured the remainder of the bottle's contents into Mrs Donoghue's tumbler, "a snail, which was in a state of decomposition, floated out of the bottle". The bottle being opaque, the snail could not have been detected until the greater part of the contents of the bottle had been poured. As a result Mrs Donoghue alleged that she suffered from shock and severe gastroenteritis. Given that her friend had bought the drink there was no contract between Mrs Donoghue and the retailer, while the friend who did have a contract with the retailer was unaffected by the event and could not seek damages on her behalf. Donoghue accordingly instituted the proceedings against the manufacturer of the ginger-beer.
Because of the preliminary nature of the case, some of the facts are unclear, the most central of these being whether there was a snail in the bottle at all. Lord Justice MacKinnon said in a speech in 1942 that when the facts came to be tried, it was found that there was no snail, and this was later repeated by Lord Justice Jenkins in the case of Adler v. Dickson. The statement seems to have been based on information given to MacKinnon by David Stevenson’s counsel, later Lord Normand. In fact there was no trial of the facts as the case was settled (for £200) by Mr Stevenson's executors following his death. Other uncertainties are whether the animal was a snail or a slug; whether the bottle did indeed contain ginger beer ("ginger" being the Scottish word for a carbonated drink); whether the drink was part of an ice cream float; and the identity of Mrs Donoghue's friend.
Lord Atkin's statement about the foreseeability of the effects of one's acts on one's neighbours is central to the existence of a duty of care in the law of tort/delict, especially on the then developing nascent tort/delict of negligence. In this judgement he formulates what is commonly known as the "neighbour principle".