| |||||||||
The Forer effect (also called Barnum effect after P.T. Barnum) is an effect based on self-validation of personality descriptions, where an individual gives a high rating of a description as applying to themselves, when in fact it is not specific. It provides an apparent explanation as to why many people accept some pseudosciences, such as astrology, graphology and fortune telling.
In 1948, psychologist B.R. Forer gave a personality test to his students, and then gave them a personal analysis. He invited each of them to rate the result on a scale of 0 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) as it applied to themselves: the average was 4.26. He then revealed that each student had been given the same analysis, and their certain responses to the test had been ignored according to what they subconsciously believed did or did not apply to them.
The analysis given was:
See also: list of cognitive biases, cold reading.
The Forer effect has been known to be used heavily in horoscopes in various publications as a way to entice readers into believing in astrology and its powers of prediction.